I thought it was about time I got back some of the railway stations
in the Borough. The last one I
did was Woolwich Arsenal so logically I now ought to do Plumstead but I’ve been
rather avoiding it because I know that it’s quite a complicated story for one
thing and for the other Plumstead has got lots of devoted local users. All of whom might be a bit upset at an upstart
like me from Blackheath writing about their station. Sorry, but I look forward to your criticizing
me and hopefully putting it on my Maryswrite Blog which where it will appear in
a couple of weeks time
So Plumstead Station: it opened
in June between Abbey Wood and Woolwich Arsenal stations. Earlier in April there had been an official
ceremony of laying the foundation stone’ - attended by officials of the
company and ‘influential residents of the district’. I’m intrigued by this report. Is there actually a foundation stone? Does anybody know
anything about it? And if no one does
should we start looking for it?
The station was built on the North Kent Line which had
opened ten years earlier in 1849 . Greenwich Industrial History Society Members and friends
should be very up to date with the history of the line since only a couple of
weeks ago we had a speaker , Richard
Allen, talking about the line in a great deal of detail with lots of amazing
pictures.
Plumstead Station opened in response to the huge 19th population
increase in the area. It was near to the Royal Arsenal and an ideal stop for
the factory workers. At this time the Arsenal was taking on vast numbers of new
workers –numbers which peaked in the
Great War.
To those who had only ever seen the station from
street level it would seem to be a small and unobtrusive little station. The main building would have seemed fairly
modest - single-storey with a tall
pitched roof, some fancy brickwork and tall chimney stacks. But once on the station itself it is very
different. The actual platforms and the operative part of the station are down
below in a cutting and the single storey street level building is in fact the
top story of a three storey station. The station did not follow the designs of
those stations already built on the line.
Down on the platforms the buildings at platform level had
a trackside façade with three arches, which look like a viaduct, and behind them
was a waiting room and offices . It is a design was unique to Plumstead.
Most
stations have a canopy to protect passengers from the elements, amd Plumstead has
an intricate canopy with valances like Dartford station. To have this facility
in the main building of a station was unusual on the North Kent line and unique
to Plumstead
Nevertheless
it attracted its share of grumblers and a letter from a Mr Sadler of Macoma
Road , who wrote to the press in 1909 to draw attention to features which the
station needed but did not have – he included the need for a booking facility on
the bridge, ‘way in’ and ‘way out’ signs
for each platform, to be available at
all times; waiting rooms and toilets for both sexes upon both platforms; ticket
offices for first, second and third
class passages; all trains which ended their journeys at Woolwich to run on to Plumstead.
He had sent a copy of these demands to
every member of Plumstອad Vestry. A shorter list came from a Mr Wright of Alliance Road, Plumstead who
wrote in 1956 aA letter taking up an entire column in the local newspaper about
the problems of the station clock.
At first there
was no footbridge, and passengers had to
cross the line via the road but a lattice footbridge was installed in
1894 and had a roof over it. In the 2000s the rail authority decided to remove the footbridge
and there were
arguments about a proposed lift and altering the various unique
features. Resident groups wrote “Access for all London Stations, especially Plumstead , is welcome
however not at any cost. Network Rail proposes installing an “off the peg”
footbridge and lift shafts, directly from the station building. This will
mean demolishing the historic bridge and replacing it with a massive
modern box structure.”
Originally the station had three platforms – the
additional one being an up-line facing bay platform connected to sidings and
including a water tower and crane. This was removed in 1926 when the line was
electrified with just the tower and
crane left while a wooden waiting shelter
was erected there. In the 1960s this
shelter was removed along with the footbridge roof.
A signal box opened in 1892 at the western end of the platforms builft in
the South Eastern Railways inhouse design. It closed in 1926.
The ‘Hole in the Wall’ was the name given to sidings
added I 1859 north of Plumstead Station on the down side the railway which linked
to the Royal Arsenal complex. There were also nine goods sidings beyond the road
bridge east of the station and a single-track connection from these goods
sidings went into the Arsenal for military trains of guns, ammunition and,
indeed, new locomotive parts. This had all been originally made in
1824 for a horse drawn tramway and inside the Arsenal was a huge complex of
light and heavy rail lines and systems. The single-track connection with the
Arsenal was taken out of use in 1967, after the military site had been severely
degraded. but some of the sidings were
later electrified.
These goods sidings allowed
military trains of guns, ammunition and, new locomotive parts to access the
Arsenal from the main line. After the Great War a number of the Arsenal’s
munitions factories became surplus to requirements, but to avoid widespread
redundancies in the area, it was decided to build fifty steam engines there.
Eventually, the Arsenal factories manufactured the components for these
locomotives, but they were transported
down to Ashford works for assembly.
The sidings to the east of the station have survived
surprisingly well but by the mid-1990s their usage for freight traffic was
virtually non-existent. But the electrified sidings whicg were retained are still in use for storage of rolling stock and more
recently by Crossrail.
The station is located at the western end of the ‘Ridgeway’ pedestrian
and cycle path which runs on top of the Southern Outfall sewer and ends up at
the Crossness Sewage Works - including, of
course, Crossness Engines Museum,
Local people have been very concerned that the
station is kept as nesr its original format as oposible and that it also
provides accessibility =- ‘Save Our
Station History!. ..... accessibility is a good thing! Destroying
local history and ignoring the local community is not! “
They continued saying that Network Rail’s plan would mean damage
to features dating from 1892 -the
demolition of the iron lattice footbridge, the removal and replacement of the
attractive brick steps, damage to the section of the building, removal of part
of a canopy and removal of a crenellated section of the original 1859 station.
They claimed that Network Rail had coerced the Area Planning Committee into
accepting its ‘lazy, one size fits all proposal, by using emotional blackmail,
ignoring requests and reneging on promises.’
Latest news is that the bridge will be kept but clearly residents will continue to fight
to keep this attractive station with its unique features

No comments:
Post a Comment