THE
GAS INDUSTRY ON DEPTFORD CREEK
There were four works connected with the manufacture of coal
gas on Deptford Creek. Obviously the gas
industry needs the coal trade because its raw material is coal – although gas
companies needed to get the right coal from the right pit. The ‘gas industry’
is not really about power generation – coal gas manufacture is a chemical
process which makes a product more easily transported than coal and can be used
as a power source.
I
thought it might be useful here to describe some of the events which took place
before the first gas works on Deptford Creek was built. The first ever gas
works, - the one in Westminster - was functioning by 1820. After that gas works
were built all round London– with varying degrees of expertise and/or honesty. What happened in Greenwich and Deptford when the
earliest local gas works was proposed?
Now
before I start – I have – just this morning – found something rather
earlier. I don’t know what happened to
it and maybe there is a whole story here which I will find out in time. I am pretty sure it was on the Creek –
somewhere on the west bank near the railway bridge.
This
earliest Greenwich and Deptford Gas Company was stated by engineer Ralph Dodds
probably around 1816. (I always thought he might be a bit dodgy). He had been busy, "a piece of ground was
taken at Deptford, upon which docks, and other Works, were constructed"
(don't ask why he was building docks for a gas works, there is no doubt a good
reason). As work continued 'a large
quantity of iron pipes, furnished by a foundry in Staffordshire, were deposited
upon the premises'. Now these pipes were eventually removed by a Mr. Fesenmeyer
who said he was owed money. Mr. Dodd said the money owed was nothing to do with
him as he was 'merely the employed agent of the company'.
Enquiries began as to who owned the company
- two or three names of shareholders were discovered and they
were approached. Some denied all knowledge of the company and others were
angry. It appeared that they had all been owned money by Mr.Dodd who had given
them shares in his new gas company as settlement of
the debt............ (whoops!)
So
back to something marginally more respectable. In Greenwich, as elsewhere, the
vestry was responsible for street lighting. They realised that there was a new
technology available for it and they were also aware of local worries on night
time crime. There were a number of contractors around who were keen to help
them solve these problems. So, in June 1822, Mr. Hedley iron merchant and gas
light contractor got an introduction to meet Mr. Bicknell, the Greenwich Town
Clerk.
Joseph Hedley ‘small
and thin’ was from Norwich but in 1822 had an office in Coleman Street in the
City. He built a number of gas works - for example in Gravesend, Dublin, Sheffield
and Leeds and many more. Later he was engineer at the Rotherhithe Gas Works described
as 'a worse arranged works that ever came to our notice'. There he was involved
in a siege of the works one Christmas Eve
– and it’s a pity I have no excuse to write about it here because ‘you wouldn’t
believe what went on!’
So in 1822 he was
getting himself introduced to local authorities wherever he could and offering
to build them gas works - although it is not clear if any were actually
completed by 1822 but he was talking to Woolwich and Dartford Vestries.
In Greenwich he took
his solicitor, Mr Tilson, to meet Mr. Bicknell and Mr. Hargrave, Chairman of
the churchwardens. Joshua Hargrave was a
local businessman. John Bicknell was the son of Sabrina Sidney, who as a young
girl had been ‘bought’ to be trained as the perfect wife. She later worked for Charles Burney at his
Greenwich school and John went on to a distinguished legal career as solicitor
to the Admiralty, and to become a fellow of the Royal Society. He was also involved as clerk to the Greenwich
Vestry for many years.
Hedley told Bickell and
Hargrave that new street lights could be in place by Michaelmas –late
September. He wrote formally for
permission to dig up the streets– offering a £500 bond as a guarantee and
‘twenty or thirty lights gratis’ were part of the deal. He would also get the
necessary Act of Parliament. A petition then went to Parliament for ‘lighting
the parish of Greenwich’ because, of the need to prevent 'horrible murders'.
One of the Greenwich
churchwardens, Richard Smith, began to complain that the parish was allowing
'strangers' to form a gas company and make a profit from it. It should be set
up by local people themselves and provide a 'good and proper light' which would
cost the parish absolutely nothing.
In July 1823 Mr Hedley
was asked to attend a vestry meeting with his tender documents. When he got
there he discovered that a Mr.Gosling had been asked to go in first to meet the
vestry. Hedley sat for two hours outside the meeting and was then told that his
tender was 'inadmissible' and that there was no record of his previous
discussions. Mr Gosling had got the job.
As the pavements were
dug up complaints from the public rolled in. Hedley was plotting revenge and he
made public the costs compared to Gosling’s.
Meanwhile Gosling got
an Act of Parliament for a Ravensbourne Gas Light and Coke Co. and many
Greenwich residents petitioned against it. He refused to say who his
shareholders were although it was hinted that 'everyone' knew.
It turned out Greenwich
vestry had broken its Standing Orders over Gosling's contract and Mr. Bicknell
resigned as Vestry Clerk. A record was
made that this had been 'illegally and shamefully expended and misapplied' . Greenwich
Vestry had not levied a rate – as they were legally obliged to - and a large majority of Vestrymen had voted
not to and the Royal Hospital had agreed with them. As a result in a Writ of Mandamus was issued
by the Court of Kings Bench – this was (and is) an injunction forcing a local
authority to fulfil its lawful obligations regardless of what it thought about
it.
So the vestry resolved
'to make a sufficient rate .... for lighting’
under protest. A vote of censure was passed on the Parish Officers for
signing an 'improvident and harmful contract' with Gosling... and ‘to pay about £5,000' for the 'gross
neglect '. Also raised were ‘expenses £10
for dinner at the Ship Tavern and £25 for a (another) dinner’.
Meanwhile Mr. Goslings
works was going ahead. An old plan shows an 'old gas works' site on the eastern
side of Norway Street– on the current site of council flats – this was Gosling’s
works which later became the site of the Victoria Foundry. In May 1824 it
turned out that the Phoenix Gas Co. was about to buy it.
Phoenix, based in Southwark
the borough, was the biggest and most successful Gas Company in South and
Kentish London in the early 1820s.
Gosling said he would
sell to Phoenix ‘at cost’ plus a percentage of future gas sales. An assessment
of the works was to be carried out by David Mackintosh's contracting firm, and
by William Anderson of the Grand Junction Waterworks. By the end of December an
agreement had been reached although numerous extras were added – like Gosling's
son’s salary, Parliamentary expenses, and investigations on his title to the
land.
All of this was handled
by Greenwich's ex-vestry clerk, Bicknell and his respectable lawyer
Mr.Tilson. I found a mention of him twenty
years earlier in the diary of a local young lady – who said that at a tea party
one afternoon her friend’s little boy caused so much disruption that he had to
be taken home in disgrace – little Tommy Tilson. Is it possible that all sharp lawyers began
as naughty toddlers?
The Gosling works was
finally closed by Phoenix in 1828 when their new works was finally ready. They hung on to part of the site for many
years and a gasholder built there by Gosling probably remained in use. It was advertised as a 'valuable property
near the river, with brick buildings and a lofty chimney, suitable for an iron
foundry or any trade needing large premises'. In the 1830s it was used by
German chemist Wilhelm Beneke and by 1841 it was let to William Joyce the steam
engine and ship builder.
Next week I’ll try and
talk about the expansion of the gas industry along Deptford Creek – also see
how similar it was to other towns around London
No comments:
Post a Comment