This week I thought that I would try
to explain a bit about one of the organisations that I sometimes quote in
various articles or suggest a look at their website. This is GLIAS, -the
Greater London Industrial Archaeology Society - and I thought some information
and a bit of their early history might be interesting. They were set up to
cover the whole of London but I thought it for us in Greenwich I
could look and see what were the
Greenwich/Woolwich/Eltham sites they
looked at in their very earliest years.
And while looking at their earliest
links with Greenwich I’ve uncovered a bit of a mystery.
Before GLIAS got going in
the early 1970s there were some publications covering industrial archaeology in
London. One was directory researched by the Thames
Basin Archaeology Observers Group, and another was also Aubrey Wilson’s picture
book ‘London’s Industrial Heritage’.
I described then in Weekender in April 2023 when I wrote about– The Industrial Archaeology of Industry in
South East London (SELIA) which was written in 1982 by the Goldsmith’s College
Industrial Archaeology Group.
So, we must take ourselves back to the 1960s when many
industries were closing down or altering. Academic historians who wrote about
industry usually did so under the headings ‘economic’
or ‘business’ history. There was a
growing fashion for ‘industrial’ or ‘labour’ history – all about trade
unions and people in the workplace. As an undergraduate - in my 30s – at Thames
Polytechnic in the early 1970s I studied that sort of labour history- I was on
the third year of their new ‘humanities’ course which had been set up look at (from
my failing memory) arts and sciences and the industrial revolution – Our other
local university - Goldsmiths -- offered both industrial archaeology and local
history studies as modules for a London University External degree. In central London, of course, Imperial
College had a whole department and a professor. And in east London a centre of
research was developed at Enfield College of Technology. .All over universities and polytechnics were
setting up courses in all sorts of new histories.
Outside of the academic world people were looking at
industrial sites which were no longer being used - things like canals and steam
engines and so on. Some of it was getting to be a bit romanticised and those
who wrote about it became celebrities... In the 1940s and 50s there had been filmmakers
who had recorded closing industries –the great world of documentaries, and
there was a major studio locally in Blackheath –.
A survey
of the Stratford based Lower Lea Valley had led to the Lea Valley
Park suggesting an industrial museum for London in some of the Three Mills
building .There and elsewhere earnest
students began to appear - they would go
in to a closing factory, measure it all up and work out a floor plan and so on.
They began to call it ‘industrial archaeology;
So, in 1968 the Greater London Industrial Archaeology Society
as set up to cover what they described as ‘a developing study and assessment of
London’s industrial past’. They should pick
up the myriad of ‘amateur’ historians with memories of their workplaces or an
interest in a particular subject – including the many, many railway antiquarians.
It was to cover the whole of London. Things
moving ahead quite quickly –
An inaugural meeting was set up in 1968 at the
Science Museum – and that it was held there really reflects the prestige with which
this future society was viewed. It was chaired by Denis Smith –who was to chair
GLIAS itself for many many years. At this first meeting he outlined the possible
aims which the organisation should have, to ensure adequate coverage of all
areas and subjects. Speakers at the
meeting included academics and well known individuals who aimed to set up a
society which could achieve work beyond what which could be achieved by local
societies. A steering committee was appointed
So what has all this got to do
with Greenwich? At the start the site
which they talked about all the time was not in Greenwich –but it is nearly. So
I’m not at all sure whether to count it as one of ours or not. It is what is
now called ‘Crossness engines’- the remarkable set of steam engines in the Crossness
Sewage works, built by Bazelgette as a major part of London’s sewage system and
opened in 1865. It was, and is, a very
remarkable site. From the 1970s a
volunteer group has worked intensively to free up the engines which had been
buried in fly ash by the Metropolitan Water Board - and today you can go and
see one of them working along with a little museum about sanitary provision in
London. If you don’t know it, well you go at once! But the problem for us
looking at Greenwich is that technically it’s in the London Borough of Bexley. It is right on the border and it is
impossible to get into the site without using roads from Greenwich - from Abbey
Wood or Thamesmead, or you can walk down the sewer from Plumstead Station. So a great deal of attention was given to Crossness
a by the 1st meetings of GLIAS whether you think it is a Greenwich
site or not is probably irrelevant.
To be perfectly honest apart
from Crossness there isn’t an awful lot about Greenwich in these early years. In the September 1969 GLIAS Newsletter is an
item about ‘The Reliant’ said to be ‘the
last operational side-lever engined paddle-tug’ anywhere in the world. But the item t is really about the Maritime
Museum rather than Greenwich industry.
They report that the Reliant will be ‘one of the exhibits in the new
Neptune Hall, due to be opened in 1971’.
I am very aware that there is now some very bitter criticism of what the
Maritime Museum did with Reliant. So perhaps we should skip over that one
quickly
There is nothing more mentioned about
Greenwich until May 1972 and that is just a very brief mention that the ‘London Transport Generating Station
received its last load of sea coal during December for steam generation.
Electricity is now produced by gas turbines. The jetty will be used by oil
tankers delivering fuel’. There is
no more explanation than that and we are left to work out for ourselves s what
they mean by the ‘London Transport generating station ‘. It’s all very well for me - I know that it is
what we refer to most of the time as Greenwich Power Station but it’s not a
wildly helpful item.
BUT Woolwich does get mentioned from
June 1972. This is because the old Woolwich Dockyard site had been acquired by the London Borough of
Greenwich for housing and offices. GLIAS explained that this had been a naval
dockyard active for over 300 years, but failed to mention that it had been
closed some 100 years previously and that the site had been in use by various
other Government bodies and the Royal Arsenal Cooperative Society. They say that The Borough Architect is
arranging for ‘a dig’ to take place, but apparently there is little enthusiasm
amongst archaeologists. A group of Denis Smith’s Goldsmiths College students recorded
some of the buildings there. This was the’ Goldsmith’s group’ which really ran GLIAS
from the mid 70s onwards. At Woolwich they were joined by people described as ‘the first organised GLIAS recording group’. I understand that the notes of this dig have
sat underneath the beds of members of the group ever since and although some
reference has been made to some of the recording done there’s never been an
entire report. Which is a pity as it was
an important piece of research early work on industrial archaeology in London -
and particularly in Greenwich.
GLIAS itself was by the
early 1970s doing very well. The newsletter
reports a great many people doing research on all sorts of subjects and was appealing
for other enthusiasts. There were
regular meetings regular lectures and talks often by prestigious people and
this has continued to the present day. In 1971 GLIAS won a national prize
offered by television programme called ‘Chronicle. This was a cash prize and very
prestigious.
What else in Greenwich featured
in the early newsletter? Believe it or
not yet it was another five years for there is another mention of a site in Greenwich. This was when GLIAS members visited the
Deptford Sewage Pumping Station, in Greenwich High Road where Mr Bourner and
his staff showed them round. Opened in 1864, it lifts sewage from much of South
London into the Southern Outfall Sewer. All the plant they saw dated from 1934.
Afterwards George Arthur led a walk
following the remains of the Nunhead -Greenwich Park railway line, opened in 1871
and abandoned in 1929. They also went into Greenwich Park with its
Coalbrookdale bandstand and then along the river front back to the pumping
station.
So, that how it all happened -
but can I come back to our Greenwich based GLIAS mystery... As I said earlier Denis Smith chaIred the
inaugural meeting but he was not elected as Chair until the 4th AGM. The 1st and 2nd AGM
s were chaired by Alan Thomas who was elected as the first chair. He didn’t turn up to the 3rd AGM which
Denis chaired as a stand in. There was
no explanation for his absence and he seems
never to be mentioned again.
Now I wouldn’t have thought
anything about Alan Thomas but I see that he lived in Langton Way - just up the
road from me in Blackheath. From
internal evidence he had been involved in the Lower Lee Valley Research group and
had led a number of GLIAS walks to places like St. Katharine‘s dock. So who was he?
There are not that many people
around now who were active in the early 1970s but there are one or two. I've
asked them but I can get absolutely nothing of any importance. They all say they vaguely remember him..One
person said ‘He was I think a journalist on the weekly trade newspaper Construction News He drove a rather nice Black Riley coupe in
which I once had a lift’. Also ‘I have only a dim memory of hearing that he
had subsequently died, quite young I guess although he was older than me, then
in my late twenties’.
So who was he –the first, Greenwich
based, Chair of GLIAS
Come on people out there
do any of us know anything about this man who was the first chair of GLIAS- is
there somebody out there who remembers him?
Thanks Dan Hayton (current Chair of GLIAS)
Michael Bussell, Bob Carr, David Thomas, Malcolm Tucker
No comments:
Post a Comment